Episode IV - Hope This Works

Welcome to Got Me A Movie. I'm almost positive that the Internet doesn't have any sites dedicated to motion pictures. I seek to rectify this. Within this blog you will find previews of movies, reviews of movies and if I can keep my laptop cool enough, uploaded images from movies.



I think it's worth noting that I have absolutely no major connections within the industry, so you can rest assured that everthing you read here is utterly uninformed. That is my guarantee to you.







You stay classy.



Thursday 1 April 2010

Review: Kick-Ass



When I began this blog I decided that I would try to post real reviews. Reviews that would be as professional and well thought out as possible. They would be considered, thorough and above all else would not descend into crass, nonsensical hyperbole.

With Kick-Ass such restraint isn't possible. It will literally melt your face.

Just as Mark Millar's already classic comic book series was a giant love letter to comic books, Matthew Vaughn's adaptation is an ode to comic book movies. It is a comedy but it is never a parody, never a spoof. It is a bonefide superhero movie, homaging, borrowing from and celebrating what came before it.

And it Kicks Ass.

The story (gleefully aware of how familiar it is) is your typical superhero origin story, but it begins with everyteen Dave Lizewski asking a question; Why aren't there superheroes in real life? It's a good question. So good in fact that Dave directly challenges the audience, demanding that you admit you've either thought about it or indeed fantasised about it. Tired of waiting Dave tries it himself and after quickly and painfully finding out EXACTLY why people don't fight crime in spandex, simply carries on and discovers that he may not be the first to try it after all.

In a perfect alternate world Aaron Johnson would have been cast as Peter Parker in Spiderman. Dave openly admits that he is Peter Parker without "the radioactive spider" and Johnson is hilarious in the role. Dave is as typical a geeky teen as you can find, awkward, uncertain, invisible to girls but he has conviction and determination. What starts as just fantasy soon becomes an addiction. When he takes on a trio of gang bangers beating somebody, and furiously tells them he would rather die than walk away you believe him, and in that moment he stops pretending. It's Uncle Ben dying, it's Tony Stark getting captured, it's Thomas and Martha Wayne getting shot. Johnson pulls off the transition and crucially keeps the balance throughout the film.

Director Matthew Vaughn does the same. Kick-Ass was a labour of love for Vaughn, after every studio he pitched to demanded the violence be toned down he raised the money himself. The film is uncompromising and the enthusiam shining through the screen is almost tangible. Kick-Ass plays as if John Woo directed a Judd Apatow movie. The film is hysterical but at the same time Vaughn proves himself a formidable action director. Some of the set pieces in this film need to be seen to be believed; bullets fly as do kitchen utensils, legs are severed and heads explode. What is remarkable is how he ably ramps up the action throughout the film. Far too often with films like this they race through the third act having delivered the big set piece at the end of the second typically leading to a disappointing anticlimax. Not so with Kick-Ass, Vaughn sets the pace expertly with each action beat eclipsing the last right until the closing minutes, leaving you salivating for the next installment.

Of course the main attraction is a foul mouthed, blood thirsty eleven year old named Hit-Girl. Played with astonishing gusto by Chloe Moretz, Hit Girl (or Mindy Macready) lands like a hydrogen bomb, instantly becoming one of the most iconic film characters in recent memory. One part Uma Thurman in Kill Bill, one part Abigail Breslin in Little Miss Sunshine she is a five foot whirlwind in a purple wig. Certain, more conservative organisations have already voiced their outrage at the violence and profanities circling her (and make no mistake, there are profanities. I'm even convinced a decision was made to reign back everyone else's language to make hers all the more noticeable) but that's the point. Hit Girl is meant to shock, she's supposed to be controversial. When people take the bait like that it makes a character like Hit Girl all the more entertaining. What annoys me so much is that such a controversy might over-shadow Moretz's incredible performance. I would imagine that John Morrisey of The Australian Family Association hasn't seen Kick-Ass, if he had he would see that Moretz is a mature, intelligent young actress fully aware of the role she is playing and the darkly comic tone of her character. Nobody is laughing at Hit Girl because she is a sweary eleven year old, we're laughing because Chloe Moretz is very funny and remarkable in the role.

And welcome back Nic Cage. Where the hell have you been? Looking back over his filmography these days could reduce you to tears but dry those eyes, because he's returned with avengeance. He plays Hit-Girl's superhero father Darren Macready and it is absolutely his best performance in years. Darren and Mindy have, to say the least, an odd relationship, when we first meet them he puts her in body armour and shoots her in the chest, then he takes her bowling. The dynamic is adorable and as their backstory is revealed, heartbreaking. Macready is quite clearly insane but he loves his daughter dearly and will do anything to protect her. As Macready, Cage turns in a soft gentle performance, when he dons his costume and becomes Big Daddy however he takes it to another level completely. Everybit as entertaining as Hit Girl, Cage plays Big Daddy like Adam West if he was playing the Punisher. It's an astonishing dual performance both eye wateringly funny and yet fearsome, perfectly in keeping with the tone of the film.

This film is just about perfect. Are there any downsides? Yes, having seen Kick-Ass the knowledge that Matthew Vaughn didn't direct X-Men 3 now physically pains me rather than just irks me. I love this film unreservedly. When I finished watching it I would have happily walked straight into another screening. I can't remember the last time I came out of a film everybit as excited as when I went in.

Never has a movie's title been so apt.

7 comments:

Jo said...

Superb review.

I thought Chloe Moretz gave one of the greatest female performances of all time- simply amazing that she was only 12 years old during filming. Might bode well for Let Me In although that still feels rushed.

Speaking of future films check out Nicolas Cage in the upcoming Bad Lieutenant: Port of New Orleans. Saw a free preview screening a couple of months ago (at the Prince Charles Cinema) and he was back to his crazy best. And he's brillant in this (also love him in Adaptation), hopefully he'll stick with the weird independent stuff although rumours that he's gone bankrupt suggest that National Treasure 3 and more rubbish like it are probably on the cards... Personally I particularly hate Lord of War.

Good point about X Men 3, Brett Ratner pretty much ruined the trilogy, I don't understand how he keeps getting work. It would be intriguing to see how Vaughan could have coped, hopefully added a darker edge. I was worried when he bought Vinnie Jones on board (and he turned out to be a horrendous Juggernaut) but it's clear he has the ability to handle violence and fun.

Anyway I like your style (great choice with the poster) so I'll check our your other blog posts. Maybe you'd be interested in this:
http://www.screeninsight.co.uk/
My friend Simon maintains a blog and we've spun off from it with a weekly podcast and a YouTube channel.

Mike said...

I've been really keen to catch Bad Lieutenant, when Cage is good he's spectacular, when he's bad we get Ghost Rider. I'll check out screnninsight this instant.

Dan The Media Man said...

AAAAaaaaah, Mr. Crossey. I expected this hyperbolic review from you and disagree with much of what you said. However, it all comes down to enjoyment and it seems that I just didn't enjoy the film. It tried way too hard for my liking and most of the jokes fell flat. What didn't fall flat though was Hit Girl and Big Daddy, two heroes who are a big fat cliché but also have an actually intriguing story.

Jo, I have to defend Ratner with regard to X3 purely because it wasn't quite a train wreck. It was a rusted, broken train with some lovely carriages (set pieces). He came onto the film very late and it's surprising it was even as coherent as it was. But then, we shouldn't point the blame for X3 at anyone but Singer, who jumped ship to remake Superman whilst forgetting it's an action film! D'oh!

We do agree on lots of things good Sir Crossey, but this isn't one of them. I wouldn't sit through this again in the cinema if someone paid me. However, bring on Iron Man 2. 5 Happy's for the first and hopefully they'll bundle in the happy's in the sequel too!

Jo said...

Ah c'mon, Ratner is a chronic waster of potential, he had some great characters and then got rid of the best and focussed on boring Famke Jansen with a hefty dose of wooden Vinnie Jones and blue Kelsey Grammar. It doesn't bode well for Beverley Hills Cop IV.

Spot on with Singer though, his Superman gave pensive looks in the middle distance a bad name and I could barely see his Lois Lane. He's rumoured to be doing X-Men: Origins: Wolverine 2, as long as they improve the title that bodes well.

Also very excited about Iron Man 2. Tony Stark is infinitely cooler than Dave Lizewski.

Dan The Media Man said...

In all fairness, Ratner directed a film that someone else had developed. It's a tough thing to do. Problem is, instead of focusing on character, he focused on set pieces. The end result was that the whole Pheonix and Cure saga was wasted in one film that had some very cool set pieces (Wolverine tearing towards Pheonix as his skin ripped and healed). They would have been better placed in better films though. I think I just try to look past the train wreck and scrape what positive I can get from it.

This whole Bryan Singer drive has got me very confused. His X-Men films were good, but in a world where most Superhero films are surprisingly some of the best films of the year now (whereas Singer was the first one to do it well/seriously), he's been outclassed in more ways than one by other directors that have taken the reigns (think Favreau, Nolan, Vaughn, Snyder, Brad Bird). I have a feeling his return to the x-men franchise will be overhyped and ultimately a bit disappointing.

Glad we could agree on Iron Man 2 though :D

simoncolumb said...

Dan,

we mention you and your blog on this weeks podcast! do have a listen!

Simon
www.screeninsight.com

Mike said...

You wonderful chap. Thank you very much for the shoutout. Your blog is brilliant. It's quality both inspires and destroys me. Stay classy

Post a Comment

Do you think what I've said is load of old bollocks? Please let me know.